1. Appendix
1
a. Innote
Harmer (2007:112)
claims that it is obvious that the approach we control our pupils’ written work
– and the approach we give briefing or correction --- will not be similar, according
to the type of written work that they make.
b. Footnote
As Harmer points out,
it is obvious that the approach we control our pupils’ written work – and the
approach we give briefing or correction --- will not be similar, according to
the type of written work that they make.[1]
2. Appendix
2
a. Innote
The differences between
spoken and written discourse are summed up succinctly by Ur (1996: 159) :
‘These may refer to vocabulary, style, grammar, content….’
b. Footnote
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
These may refer to vocabulary, style,
grammar, content, the activity of producers and receivers of the different kinds
of discourse --- anything you can think of. It may help to look at the samples
of speech and writing shown in Box 11.1[2]
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
3. Synthesizing
The differences between spoken and written
discourse are writing gives the students more ‘thinking time’ than spontaneous
conversation (Harmer, 2007: 112), differ in the activity of the producers and
receivers (Ur, 1996: 159), and differ in functions and purposes (Nunan, 1991:
10). In this point the differences between spoken and written make us as
teacher to choose the appropriate activities and ways for teaching written
language.
[1]
Jeremy Harmer, How to Teach English, Edinburgh Gate:
Pearson Education, 2007, p.112
[2] Penny Ur, A Course in Language Teaching : Practice and Theory, Great Britain,
1996, p.159
4. References
Berg, Edvan C. 1998. ‘Preparing ESL Students for Peer Response’. TESOL
Journal, 8/2: 20-25
Bond, James and Screend, Margaret.
1996. Collaborative Action Research for
English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press
Brown, Douglas H. 2000. Teaching by Principle. New York: Yessy
Press
Cell, James, Nunan, Devid and Welis,
Cocky.______. Introduction to Linguistics,
5th ed. Bangkok: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning
Faridah, Susi S. 2005. Jigsaw Strategy in Teaching Reading Skill at
MTs An-Nur Palangka Raya. Unpublished Thesis. Palangka Raya: State Islamic
College of Palangka Raya
Harmer,
Jeremy.2007. How to Teach English.
Edinburgh Gate : Pearson Education
Mansur, Yusuf. 2005. Teaching English with Fun and Fantastic at
Elementary Level (online). URL: http://www.ascd.org/readingroom/cupdate/2005/1spr
(accessed on April 13th, 2013)
Mistar, John. 2002. Strategies of
Indonesian Learners of English Across Individual Differences. Unpublished Dissertation. Melbourne: Monash
University Melbourne
Nunan,
David. 1991. Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for
Teacher. Great Britain: Prentice Hall International
Richard, Jack
C. 2003. ‘30 Years of EFL/ESL: A Personal Reflection’. International Journal, 3/2: 23-54
Ur, Penny. 1996. A Course in Language Teaching:
Practice annnnnnnnnd Theory. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar